Levitt's Abortion results disappeared when programming Error Fixed
"The Boston Fed's Mr. Foote says he spotted a missing formula in the programming oversight of Mr. Levitt's original research. He argues that the programming oversight made it difficult to pick up other factors that might have influenced crime rates during the 1980s and 1990s . . . . He also argues that Levitt should have counted arrests on a per-capita basis. Instead, he coundted overall arrests. After he adjusted for both factors, Mr. Foote says, the abortion effect disappeared.
Christopher L. Foote and Christopher F. Goetz's paper can be found here. Personally, I think calling this a "programming oversight" is being much too nice (See my post here to see an example of what you would have to miss to not notice whether you have used fixed effects). More importantly everyone who works with panel data knows that you use fixed effects.
My own work concentrated on murder rates, but I also included fixed effects. Donohue and Levitt never provided us with all their data or their regressions and would never answer any questions that we had so I just assumed that they had included fixed effects from the beginning. It would have been nice if they had provided us with this same information years ago.
My paper with John Whitley is available here.
A letter that I had in the WSJ is available here.
James Q. Wilson's review of this debate is available here.
UPDATE:
See also Steve Sailer's past work on this topic.
See also Steve Sailer's compliation of what others are saying here.
UPDATE II (I have been asked about inaccurate claims regarding my own research in More Guns, Less Crime):
See this for a discussion about claimed errors in More Guns, Less Crime
Christopher L. Foote and Christopher F. Goetz's paper can be found here. Personally, I think calling this a "programming oversight" is being much too nice (See my post here to see an example of what you would have to miss to not notice whether you have used fixed effects). More importantly everyone who works with panel data knows that you use fixed effects.
My own work concentrated on murder rates, but I also included fixed effects. Donohue and Levitt never provided us with all their data or their regressions and would never answer any questions that we had so I just assumed that they had included fixed effects from the beginning. It would have been nice if they had provided us with this same information years ago.
My paper with John Whitley is available here.
A letter that I had in the WSJ is available here.
James Q. Wilson's review of this debate is available here.
UPDATE:
See also Steve Sailer's past work on this topic.
See also Steve Sailer's compliation of what others are saying here.
UPDATE II (I have been asked about inaccurate claims regarding my own research in More Guns, Less Crime):
See this for a discussion about claimed errors in More Guns, Less Crime
Related Posts
Debate with John Donohue is again canceled, this time with only six days to goIt seems like we have been through this before. In December, John Donohue cancelled our debate that was scheduled at t- Lott v. Levitt Response FIledYesterday my lawyer filed a response to Levitt and HaperCollin's motion to dismiss the defamation case. For those inte
- Could abortion battle derail health bill?It looks like the Democrats will be working extra hard to get the votes of the two Republicans from Maine. From the Po
- Dems refuse to budge on Abortion languageA couple dozen Democrats are refusing to go along with their party's health care bill unless it includes a provision to
- The Problematic "famous file-sharing paper"Craig Newmark has previously covered the problems with Felix Oberholzer-Gee and Koleman Strumpf's widely cited and disc
- Government Accountability Office claims that Obama administration broke federal lawFrom the Washington Examiner:. . . the Government Accountability Office (GAO) reports that the Executive Office of the
Levitt's Abortion "Disappeared" When "Programming" Error Fixed
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
