Stossel takes Media Matters' to task (available here) for mangling data and not understanding the difference between relative and absolute status and that if 42% stayed in the bottom fifth, that means that most moved out of that group.
Related Posts
O'Reilly and Ingraham on Minnesota Senate Vote Recount, Also Media Matters inaccuraciesFrom the November 13 edition of Fox News' The O'Reilly Factor:O'REILLY: There are 200 votes separating Senator Norm Col
Media Matters attempts to defend accuracy of NICS systemMedia Matters cites the Violence Policy Center for evidence that the NICS system doesn't have a high false positive rat
Media Matters goes anti-semeticBig Journalism spotted this article (think before you click and get them foot traffic) blaming AIPAC and the "Israel Lo- A copy of the program that my son Maxim pitched to ABC can be seen hereThe video can be seen here or here.
- Why is the CDC doing this "research" on guns?Why does USA Today cover this? Why is this news worthy enough for an article by them? If it was important enough for
- Is Media Matters again violating campaign finance laws?This isn't the first time that Media Matters has been seen violating campaign finance laws, but if these reports are co
Stossel rips: "More 'Media Matters' Deceit"
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
