Stossel takes Media Matters' to task (available here) for mangling data and not understanding the difference between relative and absolute status and that if 42% stayed in the bottom fifth, that means that most moved out of that group.
Related Posts
Why is the CDC doing this "research" on guns?Why does USA Today cover this? Why is this news worthy enough for an article by them? If it was important enough for 
Media Matters goes anti-semeticBig Journalism spotted this article (think before you click and get them foot traffic) blaming AIPAC and the "Israel Lo
Biden refers to Republicans as "the Barbarians" at the gates"you are the only folks keeping the barbarians from the gates""stop this onslaught""the other side has declared war on - Media Matters trails GOP candidates with camerasMedia Matters Spawn Trailing G.O.P. With CamerasAaron Fielding quietly stalks his prey - Republicans - with his video c
- Media Matters just makes things upFor their note: "Washington Times backtrack: Regardless of age, conversation "should have raised alarm"" Media Matters
- Media Matter's dishonest attacks on Fox NewsHiring detectives to spy on Fox News employees? Stake out Fox News employees' homes? Using a pseudonym (a "front grou
Stossel rips: "More 'Media Matters' Deceit"
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
