According to The Hill newspaper, many Democratic Senators in swing states are distancing themselves from Obama on gay marriage. But here is the problem. This issue is going to be decided by the Supreme Court. Does anyone doubt that Obama won't appoint another very liberal member of the court who would rule that there is "no rational basis" for ruling that marriage must be between a man and a woman?
Related Posts
Unions continue spending lots of money to damage Romney in primariesObviously these campaign expenditures are made possible by the Citizen's United Case. Democrats have no problem using - Could the Supreme Court save a $1 trillion at a stroke?Remember all the promises about the 2010 health care law being budget neutral? Now people are talking about how much t
- Who will a Libertarian presidential candidate take votes from?Former two-term New Mexico governor Gary Johnson is upset that he isn't getting much attention in his presidential run.
- An important but little noticed Supreme Court decision this month: BOND v. UNITED STATESIn an attempted murder case, Bond was tried on the grounds that she had violated a federal Act implementing a chemical
- Charlie Cook's 2012 election predictionsCharlie Cook looks at the math and presents his case here:In a bell curve of House probabilities, the best-case scenari
- Even David Brooks is disillusioned with Obama's latest "Stimulus" packageFrom Brooks' article in today's New York Times (click here if you want). Of course, Brooks concludes his piece hoping
Can vulnerable Democrat Senators really separate themselves from Obama on gay marriage?
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
