From the WSJ:
A candidate for public office in any contemporary democracy may have to consider what, if anything, to do about "global warming." Candidates should understand that the oft-repeated claim that nearly all scientists demand that something dramatic be done to stop global warming is not true. In fact, a large and growing number of distinguished scientists and engineers do not agree that drastic actions on global warming are needed. . . .
Related Posts
"Overflowing" Government SubsidiesIt is bad enough that projects that don't pay for themselves are getting subsidies. The problem is that they are getti- Volt batteries catching fire kept quiet because of concern over the “fragility of Volt sales"Don't want to have anything discourage those electric car sales. Joan Claybrook isn't someone I give any weight to, bu
- So if geoengineering works, how much does that reduce any claimed externality from carbon emissions?Reducing the direct sunlight reaching the ground by 20 percent seems like a pretty large effect to me. Will the c
Very cheap, energy efficient transportation, and the government wants to kill itPersonally, I don't care about "energy efficient" transportation per se. I figure that the market will figure out- UK's "WINTER MAY BE COLDEST IN 1000 YEARS"From the UK:BRITAIN’S winter is the coldest since 1683 and close to being the chilliest in nearly 1,000 years.Latest fi
- US goes after China for subsidizing Wind Power?The complaints against the Chinese seems to focus on protectionism more than subsidies per se, but still it is pretty i
Sixteen prominent scientists say "no need to panic about Global Warming"
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
