The Washington Post explained the complete lack of coverage this year until Thursday on the Black Panther story this way:
"National Editor Kevin Merida, who termed the controversy "significant," said he wished The Post had written about it sooner. The delay was a result of limited staffing and a heavy volume of other news on the Justice Department beat, he said."
Related Posts
Piece at the New York Daily News: "Stand Your Ground makes sense"My piece starts this way:Call them what you will: “Stand Your Ground” or “Castle Doctrine” laws. Mayor Bloomb- How does the media cover Democrat and Republican connections toRush Limbaugh has this:Have you heard of Fannie Mae, Freddie Mac? You know, I didn't know much about 'em until this ne
- So what do we make of the Government Clearing GM over Volt's battery fires?There are numerous news stories over the US ending its probe over Chevy Volt battery fires. But where are there mentio
- Factchecking the claim that Obama controlled government spending: The problem with fact checkingThe Washington Post's Glenn Kessler nails the claims that Obama has controlled government spending, giving it three Pin
- NBC fires "seasoned" producer who doctored Zimmerman's 911 tapeI would be interested in knowing whether this "seasoned" producer is able to get another media related job. From Fox N
- CNN Prime Time Anchor To Breitbart: 'You Are Notoriously Evil'One of my favorite guys, Dennis Miller, has a response available here.
The Washington Post explains why it has ignored the Obama DOJ dropping the Black Panther case
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
