It would be nice to account for the difference in media coverage. ABC's poll found this:
A month and a half after the spill began, 69 percent in a new ABC News/Washington Post poll rate the federal response negatively. That compares with a 62 negative rating for the response to Katrina two weeks after the August 2005 hurricane.
Click here for a PDF with full charts and questionnaire. . . .
Related Posts
Media Ignores Michelle Obama’s Expensive Wardrobe For Years, but is Suddenly Interested in Ann Romney’s Pricey ClothesGatewaypundit has the story available here.- Blue Bloods - Women With GunsTom Selleck's show "Blue Bloods" has a woman carrying a permitted concealed handgun. At 38:30 into the show Selleck's
- Despite being forbidden from doing so, some New York Times to NBC News employees making donations to Obama's presidential campaignThe article at the Daily Caller is by Alex Pappas: Employees of news outlets including the New York Times and the Huff
- NBC doctors another video tape: Jerry Sandusky caseLast week you had Andrea Mitchell show caught splicing together a tape of Mitt Romney that completely distorted what he
- So why did Microsoft and NBC split on MSNBC?Here was the original explanation that I saw from Howard Kurtz: “NBC executives have grown frustrated at not having so
News coverage of Unemployment in US and Europe fails to mention how unemployment is defined differentlyFrom an Associated Press article in the Washington Post and Fox News on Monday: Eurostat, the EU’s statistics offi
At same point in time Americans have a lower opinion of Obama dealing with the oil spill than Bush dealing with Katrina
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
