I doubt that The Hill is using "startling admission" in a way that approves of the explanation being offered here. It has been twenty years since I worked in the Federal government, but we had good computers back then (though Orszag that just proves his point). All I can say is that I didn't think that the Federal government was particularly efficient back then.
UPDATE: Now Obama is going to people in the computer industry, particularly Steve Balmer at Microsoft, for advice. Talks about improvement in IT.
A big reason why the government is inefficient and ineffective is because Washington has outdated technology, with federal workers having better computers at home than in the office.
This startling admission came Thursday from Peter Orszag, who manages the federal bureaucracy for President Barack Obama.
The public is getting a bad return on its tax dollars because government workers are operating with outdated technologies, Orszag said in a statement that kicked off a summit between Obama and dozens of corporate CEOs.
“Twenty years ago, people who came to work in the federal government had better technology at work than at home,” said Orszag, director of the Office of Management and Budget. “Now that’s no longer the case.
“The American people deserve better service from their government, and better return for their tax dollars.” . . .
UPDATE: Now Obama is going to people in the computer industry, particularly Steve Balmer at Microsoft, for advice. Talks about improvement in IT.
Related Posts
A very rough discussion on the costs and benefits from LEDsI am linking this discussion here simply because I want to come back to it at a later date. While there are obviously - Op-ed at RealClearMarkets: Austerity Works: It's Time to Give It a TryThis piece is with my son Sherwin. The graphs are pretty powerful. The piece starts this way: Austerity or growth, is
Does the New York Times ever fact check Krugman?Normally, I don't even bother responding to Krugman's claims, but this one deserved some comment ("Hey, Small Spender,"- Will these checks really save money?If these types of checks really saved money in the long run, why would they have to be mandated? Wouldn't it pay for p
- If these bulbs would really save people money and they were as good, why are they mandated?Either these bulbs aren't as good at producing light or they aren't cheaper or some combination of the two. But it the
- "Mistrust of Government Is a Beautiful Thing"A transcript of Penn Jillette's video is here.
The Real explanation for government inefficiency: they are using old computers!
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
