Senator Thomas Carper (D-DE) said this about the new health care bill in the Senate Finance committee:
“I don’t expect to actually read the legislative language because reading the legislative language is among the more confusing things I’ve ever read in my life."
Related Posts
When Doctors need medical what choices do they make?From the WSJ:Doctors don't want to die any more than anyone else does. But they usually have talked about the limits of- The decisions by Appeals Court Judges on the Constitutionality of Obamacare haven't broken down perfectly along party linesFrom the New York Times:The three federal courts of appeal that have issued decisions on the law so far have all reache
So much for Obamacare reigning in health insurance costsDebra Saunders has this useful summary:Ryan cited the unintended consequences that employer-paid health care plans have- Another year of faster than promised increases in health insurance prices after ObamacareLast year I had this post available here. This year we have this news: The good news is that the cost of employer-spon
- Stevens and Breyer are dubious that Thomas is somehow being bought off to change his position on Obamacare caseMy question is if those opposed to Clarence Thomas sitting on the Obamacare case were asked how Thomas would decide on
- Paul Krugman's embarrassingly weak analysis on the Supreme Court debate over health careKrugman's piece on Friday, "Broccoli and Bad Faith," continues his trend for polemics over accuracy or analysis. Let
Carper: "the legislative language is among the more confusing things I’ve ever read in my life."
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
