Note that if some had looked at annual data, you would never have seen the pattern discussed in the WSJ article here.
Related Posts
Pediatrics attack: This passes for academic discussions in medicine?Simply saying that "We respectfully disagree with Dr. Lott's comments and stand by our editorial" is irksome. As one f
Seeing when relationships breakupThere is a lot of interesting data that is in need of being explained here.Worried about when you might get dumped? Fac
Among College Students Men and Women talk about the same Another stereotype - chatty gals and taciturn guys - bites the dust. Turns out, when you actually count the words, the- "No scientific forecasts of the changes in the Earth’s climate"It would be interesting to get the pseudo scientists to respond to Wharton Professor Scott Armstrong's research on fore
- Roberts and Hanson Rounds II and IIIUnfortunately, Russell Roberts seems unwilling to respond to my previous comments on his postings on empirical work. I
- The Controversy over how the Journal of Political Economy treated papers on Downloading MusicI have covered the controversy here. Stan Liebowitz has a follow up piece on the who debate here. His abstract notes:
An example of why it is so important to look at disaggregated data
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
