I have had numerous arguments over the years where liberals have insisted that there are no differences between men and women. But liberals also argue that you need to have women or some other group on the courts because they are different.
Related Posts
Briefs and Amicus Briefs in the Health Care case before the Supreme CourtThe briefs are available here. It is interesting that there are 45 Amicus briefs supporting the state's suit against t- Some pause over Scalia's views on applying the Second Amendment to the statesFrom the WSJ today:In a 1997 book, "A Matter of Interpretation," Justice Scalia wrote that he viewed "the Second Amendm
- Senator Coburn gets Sotomayor to reveal that she doesn't believe in a right to self defensePeople have a right to privacy that people can determine what they want to do with their bodies with respect to abortio
New piece up at Fox News: Let's Face It, Chicago's Mayor Richard Daley Wants to Ban Guns, All GunsMy newest piece at Fox News starts this way:As always, gun control proponents say they merely want "reasonable" gun con- The decisions by Appeals Court Judges on the Constitutionality of Obamacare haven't broken down perfectly along party linesFrom the New York Times:The three federal courts of appeal that have issued decisions on the law so far have all reache
- The Washington Post gets it wrong on comparing Easterbook's decision on applying the Second Amendment to the states to Sotomayer's decisionThe Washington Post's piece is here.But yesterday a panel of conservative luminaries on the U.S. Court of Appeals for t
We have heard for years that there are no differences between men and women, but we need a woman on the Supreme Court because the are different
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
