Sen. Joe Lieberman clearly announced this weekend that he will oppose a public health insurance option for consumers. The news at least raises slightly the probability that there could be a successful filibuster of legislation that includes that option. Bloomberg reports that Lieberman:
"said he opposes the creation of a government-run health-insurance option that would compete with private insurers as a part of a health-care overhaul because it would increase costs for taxpayers. . . . .
Related Posts
Obama's broken promise: WH staff averages 8 percent raises this last yearObama on July 6, 2011: By the way, the people who work in the White House have had their pay frozen since I came in, ou
Labor unions primary beneficiaries of Obamacare waiversFrom the Daily Caller:Labor unions continued to receive the overwhelming majority of waivers from the president’s healt- Will Obama be helping public colleges at the expense of private ones?The key here is how the government defines colleges as being "too costly." Will it simply be tuition or the amount spe
- Obama uses recess appointmentsThe Hill newspaper has this discussion on six recess appointments. The most important is for deputy attorney general.C
Newt Gives Liberal Politico Debate Moderator Heck- "Obamacare cost estimates hide up to $50 billion per Year"Wow, this is fraud. To purposely not include such obvious costs should be a real scandal, and this adds up to a total
A glimmer of hope on stopping a complete government takeover of medical care
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
