The oral arguments before the 7th Circuit can be heard here. This was a tough panel. I would guess that the final decision will be 2-to-1 or 3-to-0 in favor of the Chicago position.
Here is the segment where Judge Frank Easterbrook brings up a reference to my work, though he is arguing that it isn't relevant to the discussion.
Here is the segment where Judge Frank Easterbrook brings up a reference to my work, though he is arguing that it isn't relevant to the discussion.
Related Posts
Veterans having their guns taken awayIf this story about the VA and Homeland Security denying veterans concealed handgun permits is true, it is very disturb- Can Plymouth State University in New Hampshire ban permitted concealed handguns?A hearing in New Hampshire court will decide it.A temporary restraining order that would prohibit weapons on the Plymou
- Limes are classified as a weapon in the UK?What is next? Lime registration? From the UK Daily Mail:A chef was stunned to find she was almost banned from buying
- How can Mayor Daley get guns so backwards?Daley opposes permitted concealed handguns because of assassinations? How many permit holders have engaged in an assas
- Apparently Justice Kagan was actually involved in Obamacare discussions while at DOJFrom Fox News:With just weeks until the U.S. Supreme Court considers the constitutionality of President Obama's health
This gun-free zone sign will really work for MexicoFrom CBS Houston:President Felipe Calderon on Thursday unveiled a “No More Weapons!” billboard made with crushed firear
National Rifle Assoc v. City of Chicago
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
