The LA Times has this story:
This point about "most nations did not permit armed ships to enter ports or dock" may explain why we don't see more armed ships. Another gun free zone has its problems. We ran into this problem with arming pilots and that seems to have been worked out with some countries.
Thanks very much to Gus Cotey for sending me this link.
Reporting from Washington -- The freed captain of a merchant ship attacked by pirates near Somalia last month called Thursday for military protection and armed crew members to thwart attacks in dangerous waters.
Capt. Richard Phillips, skipper of the Maersk Alabama, told the Senate Foreign Relations Committee that it was the "responsibility of the U.S. government" to protect any ship flying an American flag, through military escorts or onboard squads of highly trained security forces.
He added that an armed brigade of specially trained senior crew members also could deter pirate attacks in certain situations.
"And I don't mean a security guard. I don't mean a mall cop. I mean someone who's sufficiently trained," Phillips said
Phillips and the private shipping line's chairman, John Clancey, differed in their prescriptions for addressing piracy in testimony Thursday. Clancey said arming and training crew officers would be prohibitively expensive and would result in a potentially deadly arms race with pirates.
But the recommendations from Phillips, widely regarded as a hero for selflessly trading his freedom in exchange for that of his 20-person crew, are likely to pressure the U.S. military to consider steps he outlined in the hearing. At the same time, military officials have said that world navies could not protect every ship, and they have recommended that vessel operators adopt more aggressive defenses.
Since the Maersk Alabama attack, the military has held several meetings with shipping companies, looking for better ways to deter pirates. Clancey said those talks were continuing.
He said Maersk Inc. had more than 500 merchant ships at sea, making the cost of training and arming crews a "very tall order," and not one with guaranteed results.
"Our belief is that arming merchant sailors may result in the acquisition of ever more lethal weapons and tactics by the pirates, a race that merchant sailors cannot win," Clancey said.
He also pointed out that most nations did not permit armed ships to enter ports or dock. Besides talks with military officials, Clancey said ships were being "hardened," including the addition of electrified rails and pressure hoses. . . . . .
This point about "most nations did not permit armed ships to enter ports or dock" may explain why we don't see more armed ships. Another gun free zone has its problems. We ran into this problem with arming pilots and that seems to have been worked out with some countries.
Thanks very much to Gus Cotey for sending me this link.
Related Posts
A note on the Second AmendmentI wrote up something for Janine Turner on the Second Amendment. It is available here.- Texas Railroad Commission may let employees carry concealed handguns at workFrom the Times Record News:Railroad Commissioner Barry Smitherman has proposed a policy change that will allow RRC empl
- Multiple victim public shootings outside the US in Gun-Free ZonesSeveral Dead After Gunman Opens Fire at Dutch Shopping Mall April 09, 2011ALPHEN AAN DEN RIJN, Netherlands -- A gunman
- New study for guns on college campusesJeffrey A. Bouffard, Matt R. Nobles, William Wells, and Michael R. Cavanaugh have a new paper entitled: "How Many More
- Virginia Governor won't allow permitted concealed handguns on college campusesIt seems clear that McDonnell is saying that he doesn't believe that "an armed citizenry can stop problems."Gov. Bob Mc
- Texas Concealed Carry on Campus passes Senate Criminal Justice CommitteeIt looks very likely that Texas will soon pass this bill. Even one of the two votes against the bill in committee will
Captain who had been held by pirates urges that crew members be armed
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
