Unfortunately, as far as I can tell, this decision as far as I can tell with respect to the 2nd Amendment is dicta. From O'Scannlain's opinion:
"We therefore conclude that the right to keep and bear arms is “deeply rooted in this Nation’s history and tradition ... The crucial role this deeply rooted right has played in our birth and history compels us to recognize that it is indeed fundamental, that it is necessary to the Anglo-American conception of ordered liberty that we have inherited. We are therefore persuaded that the Due Process Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment incorporates the Second Amendment and applies it against thestates and local governments."
Related Posts
So what happened to Chicago's Murder and Violent Crime rates after the Supreme Court decision in June 2010 striking down Chicago's gun laws?In DC, the change in gunlock laws as a result of the Supreme Court decision meant that about a third of adults already 
More on Starbucks "buycott" and "boycott"The LA Times has an interesting story on the different sides of the Starbucks and guns debate.- National Rifle Assoc v. City of ChicagoThe oral arguments before the 7th Circuit can be heard here. This was a tough panel. I would guess that the final dec
- Presentation tomorrow at the Heritage FoundationI will be giving a presentation tomorrow at 12:30 at the Heritage Foundation on McDonald v. Chicago and its aftermath.
- The false claims about Scalia's inconsistenciesTPM and other Democrat liberal organizations are launching last ditch efforts to save Obamacare. Among their targ
- Interview on Sun TV in Canada on MYTHS OF GUN CRIME
A 9th Circuit Decision on "whether the Second Amendment prohibits a local government from regulating gun possession on its property"
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
