Why should the government subsidize abortions? In any case, we seemed destined for major changes very soon. THis is hardly a very balanced article from the WSJ, but in any case it outlines the planned changes.
Supporters of legal abortion were elated by last week’s election. Pro-choice forces gained 17 seats in the House and five in the Senate – plus, of course, the White House.
What will they do with their new clout?
First up: Press President-elect Barack Obama to reverse a policy of withholding U.S. family-planning grants from any international group that provides abortions, or even counsels women about that option. “We’d like to see that overturned on his first day in office,” said Nancy Northup, president of the Center for Reproductive Rights. Mr. Obama’s transition team has already indicated he shares that priority.
Liberals also expect Mr. Obama to stop federal funding of abstinence-only education and to boost subsidies for poor women’s reproductive health care, including contraception and gynecological exams.
That agenda, if enacted, would likely send more federal funds flowing to Planned Parenthood. Along with being the nation’s largest abortion provider, Planned Parenthood teaches sex ed to teenagers across the country and offers women subsidized health care through a network of nearly 900 clinics.
The prospect of Planned Parenthood getting more taxpayer dollars – at a time when the organization is reporting record revenue – has anti-abortion activists up in arms. . . .
Related Posts
More on Obama's Executive Order on Abortions not being of any useJake Tapper has the story here.the Obama administration had approved $160 million for Pennsylvania to set up a “high ri- Health care bill in SenateDemocrats may be breathing a sigh of relief with Senator Ben Nelson's comments after the defeat of his abortion amendme
- Abortion and Crime "debate" at the University of Chicago Scheduled for May 25thThe University of Chicago Federalist Society has tried for a third time to set up a debate between myself and John Dono
- "It is not [the Obama Administration] goal to reduce the number of abortions.”From Human Events:Melody Barnes, the Director of Domestic Policy Council and a former board member of Emily’s List, led
- Op-ed in tomorrow's OpinionJournal.comI think that this is a pretty important piece: It's Not Enough to Be 'Wanted': Illegitimacy has risen despite--indeed,
- A discussion of the costs of abortionBill Flax has a useful discussion of the abortion debate and the costs of abortion available here.
Major changes ahead in abortion
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
