Here is a typical question in a medical publication called "Medpage Today":
Obviously a "yes" vote is taken as meaning that guns are bad. A "no" vote the reverse. Do I think that gun regulation is a "public health issue"? Sure. But I believe that because they on net save lives.
Is gun regulation a public health issue?
Obviously a "yes" vote is taken as meaning that guns are bad. A "no" vote the reverse. Do I think that gun regulation is a "public health issue"? Sure. But I believe that because they on net save lives.
Related Posts
New op-ed in the New York Daily News: Concealed weapons save lives, The evidence is clear: Massacres are stopped by legally armed citizensMy newest piece there starts this way:Friday’s horrible shooting in Colorado occurred in yet another place where guns a
Cholesterol and Eggs: The advice seems to be to eat as many eggs as you wantFor those interested, here is a compilation of articles on the relationship between cholesterol and eggs. The newest r- Being on "The Pill" apparently causes women to pick men who are not "compatible partners"This is actually slightly scary news. I wonder to what extent women being on the pill has resulted in those women not
- The desire to classify an "excessive" number of activities as evidence of mental illness is a mental illnessI assume that "excessive" amount of anything is not a particularly good sign, but I find it only moderately amusing the
- Gun shot detectors coming to an American city near youIf this really works as advertised, why do we need gun control when we can quickly catch the bad guys who use guns to d
- Six simple things that increase life expectancyFox News as a useful summary available here. I had one issue to raise:In fact, studies suggest that daily exercise can
Medical publication asks question: "Is gun regulation a public health issue?"
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
