This is something that occurred during a Republican administration? Why does the government have to force Sirius Satellite and XM Satellite Radio to offer noncommercial channels as a condition of their merger? Why can't consumers decide what they want? The story is here:
The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission is recommending approval of the $5 billion merger between the nation's two satellite radio broadcasters in exchange for concessions that include turning over 24 channels to noncommercial and minority programming. . . .
Related Posts
Labor unions primary beneficiaries of Obamacare waiversFrom the Daily Caller:Labor unions continued to receive the overwhelming majority of waivers from the president’s healt- "New York Plans to Ban Sale of Big Sizes of Sugary Drinks"So you ban large soft drinks. Will that reduce the amount that people drink of soft drinks? Probably. Sure,
- New York Times gives only one side of Obama - Steve Jobs discussionHere is the way the New York Times in an article entitled "How U.S. Lost Out on iPhone Work" describes the interaction
- Something to remember the next that you are on your cell phone and the airline stewardess tells you to turn it offSo what is the cost from people having to cut short what can sometimes be important calls or responding to important em
- Libertarian cities?While this is interesting, the problem that I have is: what guarantee do these places have that a future Honduran gover
- The School lunch police force small children to eat different foods than what their parents gave themThis is a pretty scary story from North Carolina. The Pope Institute has this information:A mother in Hoke County com
Why can't the government let Sirius Satellite and XM Satellite Radio figure out what their customers want
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
