Simply saying that "We respectfully disagree with Dr. Lott's comments and stand by our editorial" is irksome. As one friend wrote me: "Their response is puzzling--they just ignore everything you say and say they stand by their original conclusions--bizarre."
UPDATE: SayUncle puts this in perspective here.
Robert VerBruggen mentions the exchange here at NRO's phi beta cons.
Related Posts
How to teach economicsI think that most professors just find it much easier to teach technical material. It is pretty mindless and mechanica- Some research that I consider important on health carePlease consider downloading the research here.Uninsured Americans vs. Insured Canadians: Who is More Satisfied with The
- Surprise: Journal editors ask scholars to cite relevant articles from their journals in their researchThis is a surprise? The fact that it is primarily younger authors who get the most suggestions slightly helps to diffe
- Amazing statement from Professor Gerald Early defending Obama lying in his autobiographyWatch the latest video at <a href="http://video.foxnews.com">video.foxnews.com</a>See the discussion at 1:5
- Roberts and Hanson Rounds II and IIIUnfortunately, Russell Roberts seems unwilling to respond to my previous comments on his postings on empirical work. I
- Why aren't the health benefits of coffee advertised more?I was talking yesterday to one of the great PR people in DC, Janet Fallon, about the health benefits of coffee,"Coffee
Pediatrics attack: This passes for academic discussions in medicine?
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
