Simply saying that "We respectfully disagree with Dr. Lott's comments and stand by our editorial" is irksome. As one friend wrote me: "Their response is puzzling--they just ignore everything you say and say they stand by their original conclusions--bizarre."
UPDATE: SayUncle puts this in perspective here.
Robert VerBruggen mentions the exchange here at NRO's phi beta cons.
Related Posts
University of Colorado at Boulder setting aside money specifically to hire a conservative academicThe Denver Post has the article here:Mr. Peterson's quest has been greeted with protests from some faculty and students- Did the Journal of the Political Economy make a serious mistake in accepting a paper?John Palmer has an extremely lengthy excerpt from an investigative report on a paper on file sharing that was published
- Data on Colleges from ACT and SAT test scores to Professors' salariesA lot of detailed data is available from Chronicle of Higher Education.
- So why do younger people view Obama so positively?On issues such as Social Security reform, on labor market regulations, and what he is going to do on the national debt,
- Feyrer and Sacerdote's claims about the StimulusI have been reading through Feyrer and Sacerdote's paper on the Stimulus (available here), and there were a couple poin
- Philippine panel crime rate dataA source for Philippine panel crime rate data is here. Unfortunately, this data only seems to be available from 1983 o
Pediatrics attack: This passes for academic discussions in medicine?
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
