Sonya Jones and I have an op-ed that follows up on our previous piece on the International Boundary Commission:
What can be done to stop a presidential appointee who views himself as above the rules? Can the president fire him? A Seattle court heard motions on such a case this week. What began as a seemingly trivial property-rights dispute has quickly become a constitutional quagmire. The judge is demanding answers on the limits of presidential power, on whether the government must compensate property owners for regulations restricting their property’s use, and on the power of international government agencies. . . . .
Related Posts
New Op-ed in Washington Times: Property-rights dispute Retirees Shirley and Herbert Leu had a problem. Part of their backyard was collapsing into a ditch that ran along the - Google's continued battle to destroy property rightsGoogle wants to argue that patents are anticompetitive, but this is an extremely shortsighted view as a lot of products
- The cost of government regulation: this seems to large to believeA new study by Theo Eicher at the University of Washington finds:"Fully $200,000 of that [$226,000] increase [1989 and
- Apple v. Samsung: Samsung destroys evidence and internal documents show it deliberately copied AppleSamsung was previously punished for the exact same type of evidence destruction eight years ago. As shown in the next s
- Obama moves on patent reform to help out GoogleObama is trying to change the patent rules so as to help out his friends over at Google. Here is a useful piece from t
- Washington State Supreme Court Says People can Shoot Wild Animals in Self-DefenseSonya Jones sent me this link from the Washington State Supreme Court. The court reaffirmed the notion that people are
New Op-ed in National Review Online on Defending Property Rights
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
