The problem with gun free zones is getting more and more attention. The first is by the very famous Michael Barone in today's National Review Online:
When Florida passed its concealed-weapons law, I thought it was a terrible idea. People would start shooting each other over traffic altercations; parking lots would turn into shooting galleries. Not so, it turned out. Only a very, very few concealed-weapons permits have been revoked. There are only rare incidents in which people with concealed-weapons permits have used them unlawfully. Ordinary law-abiding people, it turns out, are pretty trustworthy.
I’m not the only one to draw such a conclusion. When she was Michigan’s attorney general, Democrat Jennifer Granholm opposed the state’s concealed-weapons law, which took effect in 2001. But now, as governor, she’s not seeking its repeal. She says that her fears — like those I had about Florida’s law 20 years ago — proved to be unfounded.
So far as I know, there are no politically serious moves to repeal any state’s concealed-weapons laws. In most of the United States, as you go to work, shop at the mall, go to restaurants, and walk around your neighborhood, you do so knowing that some of the people you pass by may be carrying a gun. You may not even think about it. But that’s all right. Experience has shown that these people aren’t threats.
Virginia has a concealed-weapons law. But Virginia Tech was, by the decree of its administrators, a “gun-free zone.” Those with concealed-weapons permits were not allowed to take their guns on campus and were disciplined when they did. A bill was introduced in the state House of Delegates to allow permit-holders to carry guns on campus. When it was sidetracked, a Virginia Tech administrator hailed the action and said that students, professors and visitors would now “feel safe” on campus.
Tragically, they weren’t safe. Virginia Tech’s “gun-free zone” was not gun-free. In contrast, killers on other campuses were stopped by faculty or bystanders who had concealed-weapons permits and brandished their guns to stop the killing. . . .
The second is by a good friend of mine, Tracy Price, in today's Washington Times:
The above list is a tiny sampling of the growing number of multiple-victim shootings, including at least 39 school shootings in the United States. What do all of the above have in common? Each occurred in a "gun-free zone." The recent killing of 32 innocent students and teachers at Virginia Tech adds another tragic chapter to this horrible book of violence and death. I, like many fathers, consider this reality when I send my sons off to school each morning. . . .
Thanks to Jon Shell for sending me the first article.
I’m not the only one to draw such a conclusion. When she was Michigan’s attorney general, Democrat Jennifer Granholm opposed the state’s concealed-weapons law, which took effect in 2001. But now, as governor, she’s not seeking its repeal. She says that her fears — like those I had about Florida’s law 20 years ago — proved to be unfounded.
So far as I know, there are no politically serious moves to repeal any state’s concealed-weapons laws. In most of the United States, as you go to work, shop at the mall, go to restaurants, and walk around your neighborhood, you do so knowing that some of the people you pass by may be carrying a gun. You may not even think about it. But that’s all right. Experience has shown that these people aren’t threats.
Virginia has a concealed-weapons law. But Virginia Tech was, by the decree of its administrators, a “gun-free zone.” Those with concealed-weapons permits were not allowed to take their guns on campus and were disciplined when they did. A bill was introduced in the state House of Delegates to allow permit-holders to carry guns on campus. When it was sidetracked, a Virginia Tech administrator hailed the action and said that students, professors and visitors would now “feel safe” on campus.
Tragically, they weren’t safe. Virginia Tech’s “gun-free zone” was not gun-free. In contrast, killers on other campuses were stopped by faculty or bystanders who had concealed-weapons permits and brandished their guns to stop the killing. . . .
The second is by a good friend of mine, Tracy Price, in today's Washington Times:
Thanks to Jon Shell for sending me the first article.
Related Posts
Pharmacist fired from Walgreens for using a concealed handgun to stop a robbery, sues WalgreensJeremy Hoven is a pharmacist who used to work for Walgreen's in Benton Township, Michigan. After being a victim of a r- A link between drug gangs and murder in Puerto Rico?From Fox News:As is common in areas that see a spike in drug trafficking, violence in Puerto Rico has also skyrocketed.
- Colorado State Supreme Court rules that permit holders can carry concealed handguns on public university campusesFrom Colorado's Boulder Camera newspaper:The Colorado Supreme Court today ruled that University of Colorado students an
- New Fox News piece: Should New York tourists have their lives destroyed because of concealed carry laws?My newest piece starts this way:Just a few days before Christmas, Meredith Graves made a mistake that could end her med
- Remember how Chicago murder rate fell last year? Well, don't look to arrests for murder being the cause"Only 30 Percent Of Last Year’s Murders Have Been Solved"Murders in Chicago were down last year, but it’s a different s
- Newest Op-ed piece: Death of a Long-Gun RegistryMy piece with Gary Mauser at National Review Online starts this way:Despite spending a whopping $2.7 billion on creatin
Two powerful op-eds on gun free zones
4/
5
Oleh
abudzar
